29 Novembre 2024 06:51:15
Notizie: aiutaci a tradurre la documentazione ufficiale di Mozilla!
0 Utenti e 5 Visitatori stanno visualizzando questo topic.
Agli utenti interessa disattivarlo sulle versioni stabili.
What are my options if I want to install unsigned extensions in Firefox?The Developer Edition and Nightly versions of Firefox will have a setting to disable signature checks. There will also be special unbranded versions of Release and Beta that will have this setting, so that add-on developers can work on their add-ons without having to sign every build.How will the unbranded versions of Firefox work?They will work just like Firefox, with two differences: they will have a setting to disable mandatory signature checks, and they will not have the Firefox name and logo (instead using a generic name and logo). They will be available in the en-US locale only.What about private add-ons used in enterprise environments?We haven't announced our plan for this case yet. Stay tuned. In the interim, ESR will not support signing at least until version 45, which won't come out until 2016.
Is this a way for Mozilla to censor add-ons they don't like, enforce copyright, government demands, etc.?No, the purpose of this is to protect users from malicious add-ons. We have clear guidelines for when it is appropriate to blocklist an add-on and have refused multiple times to block for other reasons.
Uhm, quando prossimamente ci saranno delle restrizioni di sicurezza sulle estensioni sarà interessante riscontrare se gli utenti rimarranno stabili, aumenteranno o diminuiranno.
Binary XPCOM is an old and fairly unstable technology that a small number of add-on developers have used to integrate binary libraries into their add-ons, sometimes to tap into Firefox internals (hence the unstable part). Better technologies have become available to replace binary XPCOM and we have encouraged developers to switch to them. From the original post: